How do donor-advised funds compare to private foundations?

Donor-advised funds (DAFs) and private foundations are two popular vehicles for charitable giving, each offering unique advantages and considerations for philanthropically minded individuals and families. Understanding the key differences between these options can help you make informed decisions about your charitable contributions, especially when dealing with appreciated assets like cryptocurrency and stocks.

Endaoment.org stands out as a unique DAF provider, leveraging blockchain technology to offer an asset-agnostic platform that accepts a wide range of donations, including cryptocurrency, stocks, and other non-cash assets. This innovative approach caters to the needs of tech-savvy donors looking to maximize their charitable impact while enjoying the benefits of a transparent, efficient giving platform.

​

Comparing the Structure and Administrative Burden

The structural differences between DAFs and private foundations have significant implications for donors. DAFs are established under the legal umbrella of a sponsoring public charity, which handles administrative tasks such as due diligence, tax reporting, and compliance. This arrangement allows donors to focus on their charitable goals without the burden of managing a separate legal entity.

In contrast, private foundations are standalone legal entities, requiring the donor to establish a board of directors, hire staff, and manage all aspects of the foundation’s operations. This level of control comes with increased legal and administrative obligations, which can be daunting for some donors.

DAFs typically have lower fees and minimal ongoing expenses, as the sponsoring organization handles most of the administrative tasks. For example, Endaoment charges a maximum lifetime fee of 1.5% on each fund, ensuring that more of the donated funds go directly to the chosen charitable causes.

Private foundations, on the other hand, incur substantial costs related to legal setup, accounting, tax filing, and investment management. These expenses can quickly add up, especially for smaller foundations, and may divert resources away from charitable activities.

​

Advantages and Considerations

DAFs provide simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and immediate tax benefits, making them an attractive option for donors who value efficiency and ease of use. They also allow donors to maintain a degree of anonymity, as grants can be made without disclosing the donor’s identity. However, DAFs offer less control over investment decisions and grantmaking compared to private foundations, as donors can only recommend grants and the sponsoring organization has the final say in approving them.

Private foundations offer greater control and flexibility, allowing donors to create a lasting legacy and involve family members in the foundation’s activities. They can hire staff, make direct charitable investments, and maintain full control over investment decisions. The drawbacks include higher costs, more complex compliance requirements, and a lower tax deduction for charitable contributions. Donors must also disclose their identity and financial information, which may be a concern for those who value privacy.

​

Flexibility and Control in Charitable Giving

When it comes to flexibility and control, private foundations have an advantage over DAFs. They can make grants to a wider range of organizations, including international charities and non-501(c)(3) entities, such as social enterprises and program-related investments. They can also set their own grantmaking policies and maintain full control over investment decisions.

While offering less control, DAFs still provide a significant degree of flexibility for donors. Endaoment’s user-friendly platform allows donors to easily recommend grants to a wide range of qualified 501(c)(3) organizations, both in the United States and internationally through partnerships with organizations like GlobalGiving. Donors can also adjust their fund’s investment strategy to align with their risk tolerance and philanthropic goals.

​

Choosing the Right Vehicle for Your Charitable Goals

Ultimately, the choice between a donor-advised fund and a private foundation depends on your unique circumstances, charitable goals, and financial situation. DAFs like those offered by Endaoment are often the preferred option for donors who value simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and tax efficiency, especially when contributing appreciated assets like cryptocurrency and stocks.

Private foundations may be more suitable for donors who prioritize control, flexibility, and the ability to create a lasting legacy, and are willing to accept the higher costs and administrative burdens associated with running a separate legal entity.